Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 16 Feb 2008 04:53:25 +0100 | From | Rene Herman <> | Subject | Re: 2.6.25-rc2 vdso_install breaks user "make install" |
| |
On 16-02-08 04:42, Roland McGrath wrote:
> Perhaps it makes more sense to have vdso_install be a dependency of > modules_install rather than install, since they both put things in > /lib/modules.
Would work for me -- modules_install ofcourse runs as root.
> The installed vdso images are potentially useful for a kernel when you > aren't bothering to build or install any modules, but those images are > only ever useful for sophisticated debugging uses anyway. > > Sam, any thoughts? (See arch/x86/Makefile and arch/powerpc/Makefile.)
Or maybe update the installkernel "protocol" to add these in?
> The only kind of install runs I actually care about are for packaging > system builds. There the packaged build does 'make vdso_install' > explicitly anyway (at least Fedora rpms' .spec does). So if the > consensus is just to drop the dependency on vdso_install completely, I > don't object.
Did that for now...
Rene.
| |