Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 14 Feb 2008 23:38:32 +0100 | From | Sam Ravnborg <> | Subject | Re: distributed module configuration [Was: Announce: Linux-next (Or Andrew's dream :-))] |
| |
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 01:56:13AM +0100, Roman Zippel wrote: > Hi, > > On Wednesday 13. February 2008, Sam Ravnborg wrote: > > > config foo > > tristate "do you want foo?" > > depends on USB && BAR > > module > > obj-$(CONFIG_FOO) += foo.o > > foo-y := file1.o file2.o > > help > > foo will allow you to explode your PC > > I'm more thinking about something like this: > > module foo [FOO] > tristate "do you want foo?" > depends on USB && BAR > source file1.c > source file2.c if BAZ > > Avoiding direct Makefile fragments would give us far more flexibility in the > final Makefile output.
Much better and now I see it I recall you posted something along these lines before. Is this something that you plan to look into implementing?
I can do the kbuild bits but I need you to do the kconfig stuff (which is by far the biggest effort too).
It would be much appreciated to get this.
Sam
| |