lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Feb]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] per-process securebits
    On Fri, 1 Feb 2008, Andrew Morton wrote:

    > Really? I'd feel a lot more comfortable if yesterday's version 1 had led
    > to a stream of comments from suitably-knowledgeable kernel developers which
    > indicated that those developers had scrutinised this code from every
    > conceivable angle and had declared themselves 100% happy with it.

    FWIW, I've reviewed the patch in detail a couple of times, and don't see
    any issues with it that haven't already been raised by Serge.

    You can add my reviewed-by.

    I think it does need more eyes, and some time baking in -mm.

    File capabilities are at least marked experimental, although it's not
    clear what the criteria would be to unmark them.


    - James
    --
    James Morris
    <jmorris@namei.org>


    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2008-02-01 10:11    [W:3.099 / U:0.164 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site