lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Dec]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: CFS scheduler OLTP perforamnce
From
Date
On Fri, 2008-12-12 at 15:15 +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
> Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> writes:
> >>
> >> It seems that in this case renice to higher priority with CFS did not
> >> reduce scheduling latency as well as SCHED_RR.
> >
> > Is there a question in this email?
>
> The question is how to make nice perform as well as SCHED_RR.

Depending on the circumstances, you can't - SCHED_RR doesn't bother with
fairness.

That is not to say there is no room for improvement, but that really
needs more information.


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-12-12 15:25    [W:0.142 / U:0.352 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site