Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 11 Dec 2008 12:36:47 +0100 | From | Jens Axboe <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] block: Fix LSF default inconsistency |
| |
On Thu, Dec 11 2008, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote: > > > No objection from me, getting rid of configuration options almost > > > always gets my vote :) > > > > Yeah, mine too. One recent addition was CONFIG_UNEVICTABLE_LRU - why on > > earth is that an option?! > > As far as I know, CONFIG_UNEVICTABLE_LRU depend on CONFIG_MMU > because any unevictable lru developer don't have nommu machine ;) > > I expect that nobody of mmu user don't turn off unevictable lru feature.
Perhaps I didn't frase the question correctly. My question is, why is it a visible option? Does it make ANY sense to turn off CONFIG_UNEVICTABLE_LRU?
-- Jens Axboe
| |