lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Dec]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] block: Fix LSF default inconsistency
On Thu, Dec 11 2008, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
> > > No objection from me, getting rid of configuration options almost
> > > always gets my vote :)
> >
> > Yeah, mine too. One recent addition was CONFIG_UNEVICTABLE_LRU - why on
> > earth is that an option?!
>
> As far as I know, CONFIG_UNEVICTABLE_LRU depend on CONFIG_MMU
> because any unevictable lru developer don't have nommu machine ;)
>
> I expect that nobody of mmu user don't turn off unevictable lru feature.

Perhaps I didn't frase the question correctly. My question is, why is it
a visible option? Does it make ANY sense to turn off
CONFIG_UNEVICTABLE_LRU?

--
Jens Axboe



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-12-11 12:39    [W:0.077 / U:0.080 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site