Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 01 Dec 2008 12:41:53 +0200 | From | Avi Kivity <> | Subject | Re: [Lguest] [PATCH RFC/RFB] x86_64, i386: interrupt dispatch changes |
| |
Cyrill Gorcunov wrote: > On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 12:24 PM, Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com> wrote: > ... > >> Once it's done there's no reason not to commit it. But the effort expended >> to do it is gone, without any measurable return. >> >> > ... > > Not sure Avi what you mean but as far as I know Alexander is working on > this file so he need just time to finish (we all have other duties you know :). > So I think the idea Peter proposed could be merged right after Alexander > will have finished. At least the Peter's suggestion was recorded in this > thread which means it will *not* be lost eventually. Or you meant something > else (yep, I could have it translated plain wrong)? >
What I mean is that hpa's patch makes the kernel better, so it should be applied. I'm not sure what else Alexander is working on, but I do hope the improvements will be more concrete.
(Alexander, I apologise for being so discouraging; but I really feel these improvements are marginal)
-- I have a truly marvellous patch that fixes the bug which this signature is too narrow to contain.
| |