Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 9 Nov 2008 22:37:38 +0100 | From | Ingo Molnar <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] cpumask: introduce new API, without changing anything |
| |
* Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote:
> > On Sat, 8 Nov 2008, Rusty Russell wrote: > > > > > > Ok, I sent through the latest delta on top of this before, but see below. > > > > Can somebody send a final patch-set to me? Right now I have multiple > > versions of patches, apparently on top of each other, and sometimes > > multiple patches per email. Very confusing, and I do _not_ want to > > apply the wrong thing by mistake. > > I've got them collected and tested (and so has Rusty), see the tree > URI below. There's no pending problem left that i know of. I also > just did a fresh test-build and test-boot of this tree, for good > measure.
Thomas did a cross-build test of Linus's latest (v2.6.28-rc3-261-g8b805ef), and it seems OK (see the results below) - no new cross-build failures introduced.
Ingo
---------------> Run 142: 2008-11-09 21:38:04 .. 2008-11-09 22:30:35
Run 142: 17 of 19 operations OK Run 142: 2 of 19 operations FAILED
http://www.tglx.de/autoqa-logs/000142-0008-0005.log http://www.tglx.de/autoqa-logs/000142-0008-0015.log
Changed warnings: http://www.tglx.de/autoqa-logs/d000141-000142-0008-0006.log http://www.tglx.de/autoqa-logs/d000141-000142-0008-0023.log http://www.tglx.de/autoqa-logs/d000141-000142-0008-0024.log
Full results at: http://www.tglx.de/autoqa/index _______________________________________________ autoqa mailing list autoqa@www.tglx.de http://www.tglx.de/mailman/listinfo/autoqa
| |