Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 8 Nov 2008 14:13:53 -0800 | From | "Yinghai Lu" <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 1/1] irq: Maintain user set affinity |
| |
On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 1:35 PM, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote: > On Tue, 4 Nov 2008 10:31:05 -0600 (CST) > Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org> wrote: > >> >From 819ad3ed4660f4238e053728a8b5aa93d22b13d7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >> From: Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org> >> Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 10:13:53 -0600 >> Subject: [PATCH 1/1] irq: Maintain user set affinity >> >> This addresses a regression in that if a user specified an affinity >> for an interrupt that affinity information would get reset between >> a request_irq(), free_irq() and request_irq() for the same irq. >> ... > > Are you able to identify when this regression occurred? It isn't > immediately obvious to me. > > If the regression is present in 2.6.27 or earlier, do you think we > should backport the fix? If so, a different patch would be needed due > to the presence of
it seems that is not a regression...
YH
| |