Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 3 Nov 2008 22:23:11 -0800 | Subject | Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/5] memcg : force_empty to do move account | From | Paul Menage <> |
| |
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 10:17 PM, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote: >> > >> > mem = memcg; >> > - ret = mem_cgroup_try_charge(mm, gfp_mask, &mem); >> > + ret = __mem_cgroup_try_charge(mm, gfp_mask, &mem, true); >> >> Isn't this the same as the definition of mem_cgroup_try_charge()? So >> you could leave it as-is? >> > try_charge is called by other places....swapin. >
No, I mean here you can call mem_cgroup_try_charge(...) rather than __mem_cgroup_try_charge(..., true).
Paul
| |