Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 21 Nov 2008 11:07:10 -0800 | Subject | Re: [PATCH] cpuset: rcu_read_lock() to protect task_cs() even we don't dereference to task_cs()'s return value | From | Paul Menage <> |
| |
On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 11:05 AM, Paul Menage <menage@google.com> wrote: > > Wouldn't this be fixed by your patch that adds an rcu_read_lock() to > task_subsys_state() ? >
Sorry, your other patch actually adds the rcu_read_lock() to task_cgroup(). But adding an rcu_read_lock() to task_subsys_state() would also help here.
Paul
| |