Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 19 Nov 2008 08:31:56 -0800 | From | Max Krasnyansky <> | Subject | Re: Using cpusets for configuration/isolation [Was Re: RT sched: cpupri_vec lock contention with def_root_domain and no load balance] |
| |
Ingo Molnar wrote: > * Max Krasnyansky <maxk@qualcomm.com> wrote: > >> What you described is almost exactly what I did in my original cpu >> isolation patch, which did get NAKed :). Basically I used global >> cpu_isolated_map and exposed 'isolated' bit, etc. > > Please extend cpusets according to the plan outlined by PeterZ a few > months ago - that's the right place to do partitioning.
Already did. It's all in mainline. The part you quoted was just pointing out that the original approach was not correct.
Max
| |