lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Nov]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Using cpusets for configuration/isolation [Was Re: RT sched: cpupri_vec lock contention with def_root_domain and no load balance]


Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Max Krasnyansky <maxk@qualcomm.com> wrote:
>
>> What you described is almost exactly what I did in my original cpu
>> isolation patch, which did get NAKed :). Basically I used global
>> cpu_isolated_map and exposed 'isolated' bit, etc.
>
> Please extend cpusets according to the plan outlined by PeterZ a few
> months ago - that's the right place to do partitioning.

Already did. It's all in mainline. The part you quoted was just pointing out
that the original approach was not correct.

Max


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-11-19 17:35    [W:0.081 / U:0.468 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site