Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 30 Oct 2008 15:58:21 +0100 | From | "Kay Sievers" <> | Subject | Re: s390: struct device - replace bus_id with dev_name(), dev_set_name() |
| |
On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 12:38, Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> wrote: > On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 10:32:00AM +0100, Cornelia Huck wrote: >> On Thu, 30 Oct 2008 01:57:07 +0100, >> Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@vrfy.org> wrote: >> >> > From: Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@vrfy.org> >> > Subject: s390: struct device - replace bus_id with dev_name(), dev_set_name() >> > >> > Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com> >> > Cc: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com> >> > Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de> >> > Signed-Off-By: Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@vrfy.org> >> >> Other than the fact that this patch is a bit mis-named (it just gets >> rid of BUS_ID_SIZE), this looks fine to me.
Yeah, sorry, it's one of the 49 patches, where the subjects isn't right, because you did the conversion already. :)
> Who is supposed to send this upstream and when?
Would be fine if it goes through the s390 tree, and gets merged there soon so it shows up in -next.
Thanks, Kay
| |