lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Oct]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH -tip/cpus4096-v2] cpumask: fix cpumask of call_function_data

* Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> wrote:

> On Friday 24 October 2008 15:47:20 Hiroshi Shimamoto wrote:
> > From: Hiroshi Shimamoto <h-shimamoto@ct.jp.nec.com>
>
> Ingo, because of these concerns I recommend you revert
> d4de5ac3b5e70928c86e3e5ac311f16cbf2e9ab3 (cpumask:
> smp_call_function_many()) for now, and apply this less contentious
> version.

ok - applied it to tip/cpus4096-v2, thanks Rusty!

If there's any chance for this in v2.6.28 then only if we disable the
dynamic API branch altogether [CONFIG_MAXCPUS] and keep that for
v2.6.29. This means we'd bring in the API changes which should have
trivial impact only - and none of the riskier changes.

Hm?

Andrew, have we missed the boat on this?

Ingo


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-10-27 13:59    [W:0.086 / U:0.288 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site