Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 25 Oct 2008 13:08:51 +1100 | From | Stephen Rothwell <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] User namespaces: set of cleanups (v2) |
| |
Hi David,
On Fri, 24 Oct 2008 19:44:01 +0100 David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> wrote: > > Serge E. Hallyn <serue@us.ibm.com> wrote: > > > I've just tested with David's plain creds-v3 tree > > Note the creds-v4 branch is now current. Is it worth me replacing that with a > tree that just has a master branch to simplify things?
It would be good if you could have a "next" (or "creds-next" or something) branch in your tree and I can fetch that (that way I don't have to keep updating my configs). It is OK if thet branch rebases and may just be an alias for another branch (or a subset if you have experimental stuff in there. Remember "posted, reviewed, tested before it is in linux-next".
Thanks.
-- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/ [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] | |