Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH 0/8] scheduler patches | From | Peter Zijlstra <> | Date | Fri, 24 Oct 2008 12:29:11 +0200 |
| |
On Fri, 2008-10-24 at 12:26 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > * Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> wrote:
> > 6-8 29 work > > Could we have a #9 that uses a no-fastpath-overhead min() method instead > of avg_vruntime? Maybe we can get away without that overhead?
Looking at that suggestion, maybe I'll redo 7/8 so at to not depend on 6/8 using min from the get-go and fixing that XXX as well.
Will have to poke at it a little.
| |