Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 2 Oct 2008 15:23:59 -0400 (EDT) | From | Steven Rostedt <> | Subject | Re: [RFC patch 0/5] genirq: add infrastructure for threaded interrupt handlers |
| |
On Thu, 2 Oct 2008, Daniel Walker wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-10-02 at 20:42 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > > Clearly you have neither clue about real time nor about operating > > systems in general. > > Here we go again Thomas.. You think you can have a conversation without > the insults for once? > > > Solaris, some BSDs and MacOSX use interrupt threads. Where exactly is > > the relation to realtime? > > The very fact that you mention it in your release notes .. You mention > the type of system in "preempt-rt" and the advantage of your system.. > > > The concept of interrupt threads is nothing which is in any way > > related to real time. It is a well known and pretty old concept in > > operating system design. > > > > The fact that real time operating systems benefit from interrupt > > threads is a totally different topic. > > > > The fact that a direct relationship exists means that any threaded > interrupt system needs to take into account the inevitable connection to > real time since it will be used in that system as a core component.. If > you can't effectively achieve real time with your system , than that's a > problem that needs to be addressed.
Daniel, what kind of logic is this? I was already accused of being on crack today (but was just too much coffee). Perhaps you might be the one that's on crack.
I build a pipe. There exists a relationship between a pipe and crap running through it from my toilet. Does this mean that every time I need a pipe, that I need to take into account the inevitable connection to crap to run through it?
God, I can see the problems with my gas lines.
-- Steve
| |