Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [ANNOUNCE] iommu-2.6.git tree | From | David Woodhouse <> | Date | Sat, 18 Oct 2008 16:51:37 +0100 |
| |
On Sun, 2008-10-19 at 02:43 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Sure (I assume the "master" branch).
Yes. I don't use branches in public-facing repositories -- it's much better just to have separate trees.
> However, I already have a tree in -next called iommu. It is one of the > tip auto branches (auto-iommu-next) and is currently empty. So do I name > this one dwmw2-iommu, or has Ingo finished with the other one?
I believe the plan is that Ingo has finished with the other one and we use the new one instead, yes.
-- David Woodhouse Open Source Technology Centre David.Woodhouse@intel.com Intel Corporation
| |