Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 14 Oct 2008 18:55:34 +0400 | From | Evgeniy Polyakov <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 1/5] HDQ Driver for OMAP2430/3430 |
| |
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 07:30:58AM -0700, Andrew Morton (akpm@linux-foundation.org) wrote: > > Why not just skipping the waiting and returning error pretending user > > really sent a signal? > > Better than nothing, but because signal_pending() isn't actually true, > upper layers wil behave differently.
If they check...
For example omap_hdq_break() can be interrupted and omap_hdq_probe() does not check its return value.
-- Evgeniy Polyakov
| |