Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 11 Oct 2008 11:12:14 -0400 | From | Bill Davidsen <> | Subject | Re: |
| |
Yudha Harimantoro T wrote: > Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 16:41:36 -0400 > From: Bill Davidsen > > > >> Yudha Harimantoro T wrote: >> >>> Hi all, >>> Yesterday I build kernel 2.6.26.6 and it's run well. Today I got >>> 2.6.27 patch and try to build it. >>> >>> I build with `make oldconfig` and answer any question with default answer, I just press [enter]. >>> I build with `make`. No error and all compiled. >>> Then I install with `make modules_install` and `make install`. >>> >>> > > >> I realize that this is a low-probability thought, but did you: >> - apply the patch against 2.6.26 NOT 2.6.26.6 >> > Yup, I've did it. > >> - run make clean before applying the patch >> > I still need this for a pure 2.6.26? I'll try this. > > >>> After reboot the system I got 'kernel panic'. >>> This is the error picture : >>> http://www.ryht.co.cc/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/pa101358.jpg >>> Is it a bugs? >>> >>> http://www.ryht.co.cc/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/pa101353.jpg [2.6.26.6 run well] >>> > > >> I keep configs in a separate place. I would first copy a 2.6.26 tree to a new directory (cp -rl linux-2.6.26 linux2.6.27) then be sure I had a clean copy with "make distclean" (or "make mrproper") and then apply the 2.6.27 patch. Then I would copy the 2.6.26 (or maybe 2.6.26.6) config to .config, and make the oldconfig. >> None of that is magic, it just keeps me from making common mistakes, lets me start with a clean 2.6.27, etc, etc. >> You mentioned oldconfig, but not starting back with a clean 2.6.26, which made me think of this. >> > Hm, I `cp /boot/config .config` in new kernel tree [2.6.27] for the > config. Do I make mistakes? >
No, I was just noting that I try to start oldconfig with a known working config, to reduce the number of choices and possible errors. I wasn't sure if you did that, so I mentioned it.
-- Bill Davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com> "Woe unto the statesman who makes war without a reason that will still be valid when the war is over..." Otto von Bismark
| |