lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Jan]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] x86: provide a DMI based port 0x80 I/O delay override.
    On 07-01-08 23:27, Bodo Eggert wrote:

    > On Mon, 7 Jan 2008, H. Peter Anvin wrote:

    >> There might have been a few 386/20's clocking the ISA bus at ­­÷3 (6.67
    >> MHz) rather than ÷2 (10 MHz) or ÷2.5 (8 MHz).
    >
    > Yes, and the remaining users should set the kernel option. Both of them.
    > The question is: How will they be told about the new kernel option?

    What exactly are you guys still talking about? Alan is looking at drivers
    and finds that in them outb_p is generally correct and correctly specified
    in bus-clocks for at least some (8390 was quoted). In those legacy drivers,
    the _p ops can simply stay and can use the 15-year old proven 0x80 outb.

    (with molnar suggesting they be renamed isa_in/outb_p and me suggesting that
    if someone would be doing _that_ they might as well split them manually in
    outb(); slow_down_io() possibly renaming slow_down_io() to isa_io_delay() or
    similar).

    Is this only about the ones then left for things like legacy PIC and PIT?
    Does anyone care about just sticking in a udelay(2) (or 1) there as a
    replacement and call it a day?

    Rene.

    --
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2008-01-08 00:05    [W:3.627 / U:0.092 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site