Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 6 Jan 2008 10:26:19 +0100 | From | Ingo Molnar <> | Subject | Re: [patch 0/5] enhance WARN_ON series |
| |
* Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org> wrote:
> 3rd try for this patch series; now with a split up patch for __WARN_ON > > This series has the goal of extending the usefulness of the WARN_ON() > information, at least on architectures that use the generic WARN_ON() > infrastructure. (Those who do their own thing either already have the > extra information, or could consider switching to the generic code). > In order to do that, WARN_ON() first needs to be uninlined since > there's like 1200 callsites and adding code to each of those isn't > pretty. > > As part of this, I had to split the __WARN_ON patch in -mm into 2 > pieces, one to introduce __WARN_ON, and a separate one to do the ifdef > cleanup.
i've added the first 3 patches to x86.git, for further testing - and would expect -mm to pick up #4/#5.
Ingo
| |