lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Jan]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [patch 0/5] enhance WARN_ON series

    * Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org> wrote:

    > 3rd try for this patch series; now with a split up patch for __WARN_ON
    >
    > This series has the goal of extending the usefulness of the WARN_ON()
    > information, at least on architectures that use the generic WARN_ON()
    > infrastructure. (Those who do their own thing either already have the
    > extra information, or could consider switching to the generic code).
    > In order to do that, WARN_ON() first needs to be uninlined since
    > there's like 1200 callsites and adding code to each of those isn't
    > pretty.
    >
    > As part of this, I had to split the __WARN_ON patch in -mm into 2
    > pieces, one to introduce __WARN_ON, and a separate one to do the ifdef
    > cleanup.

    i've added the first 3 patches to x86.git, for further testing - and
    would expect -mm to pick up #4/#5.

    Ingo


    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2008-01-06 10:29    [W:2.405 / U:0.056 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site