lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Jan]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [CPUISOL] CPU isolation extensions
From
Date

On Mon, 2008-01-28 at 10:32 -0800, Max Krasnyanskiy wrote:
> Just this patches. RT patches cannot achieve what I needed. Even RTAI/Xenomai can't do that.
> For example I have separate tasks with hard deadlines that must be enforced in 50usec kind
> of range and basically no idle time whatsoever. Just to give more background it's a wireless
> basestation with SW MAC/Scheduler. Another requirement is for the SW to know precise timing
> because SW. For example there is no way we can do predictable 1-2 usec sleeps.
> So I wrote a user-space engine that does all this, it requires full control of the CPU ie minimal
> overhead from the kernel, just IPIs for memory management and that's basically it. When my legal
> department lets me I'll do a presentation on this stuff at Linux RT conference or something.

What kind of hardware are you doing this on? Also I should note there is
HRT (High resolution timers) which provided microsecond level
granularity ..

Daniel



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-01-29 00:47    [W:0.155 / U:0.308 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site