Messages in this thread | | | From | Mike Frysinger <> | Subject | Re: [LTP] [TEST] : LTP Build failure on 2.6.24 kernel | Date | Mon, 28 Jan 2008 15:43:16 -0500 |
| |
On Monday 28 January 2008, Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 06:53:15AM -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > On Monday 28 January 2008, Rishikesh K. Rajak wrote: > > > Here i am getting failure on the x86_64 machine with new kernel. > > > > > > Here is the uname for that machine: > > > > > > rishi@:~/ltp-full-20071231# uname -a > > > Linux rishi.in.ibm.com 2.6.24 #1 SMP PREEMPT Mon Jan 28 06:47:28 UTC > > > 2008 x86_64 GNU/Linux > > > > i'm guessing you're using ubuntu and thus dash is your /bin/sh ... > > shouldnt be a 2.6.24 issue > > > > > make[4]: Entering directory > > > `/root/ltp-full-20071231/testcases/network/tcp_cmds/ftp' > > > ../../generate.sh > > > ../../generate.sh: 60: arith: syntax error: "cnt=cnt-1" > > > > sadly, this is becoming a FAQ. ubuntu ships a broken /bin/sh (dash) and > > thus some LTP scripts fall apart. i would prefer to not change the > > scripts as the message is simple in LTP: fix your shell, dont add hacks > > to LTP. otherwise we slowly back ourselves into this corner with the > > shell scripts where we try to support every craptastic shell out there > > and we're afraid to make any changes because we dont know what crappy > > shell is going to drop a brick. LTP scripts are written to be POSIX > > complaint and only POSIX complaint shells should be provided by /bin/sh. > > You better fulfil your claim "LTP scripts are written to be POSIX > complaint" before complaining about shells being unhappy with your > script. E.g. where in IEEE 1003.1-2004 is the "local" you use specified?
yes, local is a bsd extension not in POSIX. it has been implemented by every shell so far though. as soon as someone complains, i'll be more than happy to fix it.
> Or instead of working on making your script using only the stuff > specified in IEEE 1003.1-2004 you could simply replace the #!/bin/sh at > the top with a #!/bin/bash and everbody will be happy.
no -mike [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] | |