Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 26 Jan 2008 22:01:51 -0800 | From | Andrew Morton <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] defer printks in irqs |
| |
> On Thu, 24 Jan 2008 15:23:03 -0800 Tim Bird <tim.bird@am.sony.com> wrote: > Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > I suspect these features reduce the chance a crash messages makes it out > > onto the console, but fail to spot any of the copious text mention this > > critical issue. > > Anything not in interrupts would not be deferred. > The following code is meant to avoid deferring in oops as well. > I'm not sure if that covers all crash cases or not. > If you know of other cases, and ways to detect them, please advise. >
Yes, using oops_in_progress seems an appropriate fix for that.
I assume that another downside is that printk-from-interrupt will now get jumbled up with an interrupted pritk-from-non-interrupt.
Please use checkpatch.
| |