lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Jan]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/6] POWERPC: use KSYM_NAME_LEN
[Paulo Marques - Wed, Jan 23, 2008 at 06:59:09PM +0000]
> Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
>> [Paulo Marques - Wed, Jan 23, 2008 at 06:26:28PM +0000]
>>> Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
>>>> [...]
>>>> case 's':
>>>> - getstring(tmp, 64);
>>>> + getstring(tmp, sizeof(tmp));
>>>> if (setjmp(bus_error_jmp) == 0) {
>>>> catch_memory_errors = 1;
>>>> sync();
>> just after that poin in the original code a call to kallsyms_lookup_name
>> is done - so i think it could be an overflow (of course it depends
>> on what *exactly* the name is being searched, and Paulo - I didn't
>> managed to get *the whole picture* of what is going on in this
>> code - so the thoughs were like: kallsyms_lookup_name could find
>> a quite long name restricted by KSYM_NAME_LEN (dunno how it could
>> happens - due to buggy code or due to memory corruption outside,
>> it does not matter - the only matter - it *could* find that long
>> name).
>
> Ah, now I understand your confusion: kallsyms_lookup_name doesn't fill the
> name. It searches the name and returns the address. It is the _caller_ that
> fills the name, not kallsyms_lookup_name.
>
> It is used for stuff like: "give me the address of function foo":
> addr = kallsyms_lookup_name("foo");
>

oh my, how could I oversight that... damn!!! my bad!!!

>> Anyway - it's just an attempt ;) we always could drop it far-far away ;)
>
> I think that using KSYM_NAME_LEN would be a nice cleanup for xmon, but it
> is for the powerpc guys to decide if they want to do it. I just wanted to
> point the change in behavior so that it wouldn't go unnoticed.

thanks, it's really important

>
> For all we know, the stack may at that point be close to full and an extra
> 64 bytes may tip it over the edge.
>

oops, thanks for pointing out

>>> This also introduces a change in behavior. It is still a nice cleanup,
>>> though. So, if the powerpc people feel they can spare an extra 64 bytes
>>> of stack here, I guess it's ok.
>> Thanks a lot for review Paulo!
>
> No problem. I always keep an eye out for kallsyms related stuff.

;)

>
> --
> Paulo Marques - www.grupopie.com
>
> "There cannot be a crisis today; my schedule is already full."
>
- Cyrill -


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-01-23 20:11    [W:0.037 / U:0.084 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site