lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Jan]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [linux-kernel] Re: [PATCH] x86: provide a DMI based port 0x80 I/O delay override.
    On 17-01-08 22:58, David Newall wrote:

    > Rene Herman wrote:

    >> Over the course of a 100 messages or so in this thread it's been
    >> determined that the best course of action is to keep the out for ISA
    >> and replace it with udelay() for chipset logic. Now go away.
    >
    > Rather than this incredible rudeness, why don't you direct your energy
    > towards convincing Alan of this. He's the hold-out.

    No he isn't and that's why I'm rude -- everything needs to be repeated over
    and over and over again. Read the thread(s). You didn't limit your reply to
    chipset logic and Alan even already submitted patches to isolate the delay
    for the chipset logic (PIC and PIT that is) where the expectation is that a
    simple udelay() will suffice.

    We've already talked about ISA bus speed, and how it's not in a sane sense
    portably determinable, we've already talked about kernel parameters, about
    udelay and it's usefulness in early boot, about how your rude "Junk I/O" is
    exactly what is needed for some ISA devices and so on...

    In fact, we're blue in the face from talking about it. So say something
    useful or go away.

    Rene


    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2008-01-17 23:21    [W:6.519 / U:0.008 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site