Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 13 Jan 2008 00:23:22 +0200 | From | Adrian Bunk <> | Subject | Re: Top 10 kernel oopses for the week ending January 12th, 2008 |
| |
On Sat, Jan 12, 2008 at 10:48:05AM -0800, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > The http://www.kerneloops.org website collects kernel oops and > warning reports from various mailing lists and bugzillas as well as > with a client users can install to auto-submit oopses. > Below is a top 10 list of the oopses collected in the last 7 days. > (Reports prior to 2.6.23 have been omitted in collecting the top 10) > > This week, a total of 136 oopses and warnings have been reported, > compared to 46 reports in the previous 7 days. > > kerneloops.org news: > * Based on feedback from last weeks report, the website now tries > to also present a disassembled Code: line > * the kerneloops collection client is now part of Fedora (rawhide) > (yum install kerneloops) > * the kerneloops collection client is now included in Debian testing > (apt-get install kerneloops) > * gentoo has received an updated version of the client > > > Rank 1: implement (hid code) > WARN_ON at drivers/hid/hid-core.c:784 > Reported 23 times (39 total reports) > This appears to be the kernel doing a WARN_ON based on unexpected ioctl() arguments > More info: http://www.kerneloops.org/search.php?search=implement >...
The only complete bug reports seems to be from one user who loaded a module whose distribution might be considered a criminal act in some countries.
All the other reports only contain the plain trace. Is there any way to get more information whether the former is a pattern or not, and to get this information somehow displayed on the webpage?
cu Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days. "Only a promise," Lao Er said. Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
| |