Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 25 Sep 2007 23:05:32 +0900 | From | Tejun Heo <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 1/4] module: implement module_inhibit_unload() |
| |
Rusty Russell wrote: > On Tue, 2007-09-25 at 17:36 +0900, Tejun Heo wrote: >> Hmmm.... There doesn't seem to any reason why the blocking should be >> after calling ->exit(). And, yeah, it would be more useful and >> intuitive if blocking happens before ->exit(). What do you think? > > *That* I have no problem with. > > I was going to say "just grab a reference to every module" except if a > new module is loaded you don't know about it. > > If you move your blocking, it seems fine.
Great, I think I was too occupied with the sysfs case when I was writing it. I'll update the patch. Thanks a lot.
-- tejun - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |