Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 24 Sep 2007 12:14:57 +0100 | Subject | Re: 2.6.23-rc6-mm1 | From | (Mel Gorman) |
| |
On (22/09/07 14:11), Satyam Sharma didst pronounce: > > > -static volatile int kgdb_hwbreak_sstep[NR_CPUS]; > > +volatile int kgdb_hwbreak_sstep[NR_CPUS]; > > That looks fishy to me. Why is it volatile-qualified?
It turned out that it was unnecessary. A follow-up patch removed the volatile and kept the static.
> And does that > actually want to be a per-cpu var? >
-- -- Mel Gorman Part-time Phd Student Linux Technology Center University of Limerick IBM Dublin Software Lab - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |