Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 21 Sep 2007 16:06:16 -0400 (EDT) | From | "Robert P. J. Day" <> | Subject | Re: + oom-move-prototypes-to-appropriate-header-file.patch added to -mm tree |
| |
On Fri, 21 Sep 2007, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 21, 2007 at 12:38:03PM -0700, David Rientjes wrote: > > On Fri, 21 Sep 2007, Alexey Dobriyan wrote: > > > > > > Move the OOM killer's extern function prototypes to include/linux/oom.h and > > > > include it where necessary. > > > > > > > > Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@suse.de> > > > > Acked-by: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com> > > > > > > NAK. Target in corresponding Kbuild is wrong. sched.h is overkill. > > > Could we please also drop extern's while in protos? > > > > > > > I'll prevent including sched.h in a follow-up patchset that I'll be > > posting soon (and you'll be Cc'd). Which Kbuild target are you referring > > to? > > It's header-y vs unifdef-y in include/linux/Kbuild. The former is > for plain headers exported to userspace as-is. The latter need > preprocessing to remove __KERNEL__, CONFIG_*, etc.
AFAIK, the only preprocessing that's removed is "__KERNEL__".
rday -- ======================================================================== Robert P. J. Day Linux Consulting, Training and Annoying Kernel Pedantry Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA
http://crashcourse.ca ======================================================================== - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |