Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 19 Sep 2007 10:46:54 -0700 | From | Ulrich Drepper <> | Subject | Re: follow-up: discrepancy with POSIX |
| |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Andi Kleen wrote: >> But the spec calls for a "null address" to be used and that's in my >> understanding something different from using AF_UNSPEC. > > memset(&sockaddr, 0, sizeof(sockaddr)) should give you AF_UNSPEC
But the spec calls for <quote>null address for the protocol</quote>.
That means the family for the null address is the same as the family of the socket.
- -- ➧ Ulrich Drepper ➧ Red Hat, Inc. ➧ 444 Castro St ➧ Mountain View, CA ❖ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFG8WCO2ijCOnn/RHQRAgtsAJ9qTFVj5QQbVG/hUflxo/6uPOfl4QCdHSX8 wi2GX7B0pht8VDaswYLqdpM= =sMSg -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |