Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 19 Sep 2007 15:23:27 +0200 | From | Karel Zak <> | Subject | Re: iso9660 vs udf |
| |
On Sat, Sep 15, 2007 at 11:49:31PM +0200, Andries E. Brouwer wrote: > What goes wrong on the mount side is that when it hesitates between > iso9660 and udf it decides for udf when seeing "NSR02". > Maybe the heuristics in mount should be tuned.
I'd like to see the CD image (or at least first 2Mb). Also try:
# blkid -c /dev/null /dev/cdrom # /lib/udev/vol_id /dev/cdrom
Maybe vol_id provides better information -- the udf/iso code in libblkid seems poorer that in libvolume_id.
> If anybody feels responsible for mount and/or this kernel area > we might discuss.
mount(8) --> util-linux-ng@vger.kernel.org
Karel
-- Karel Zak <kzak@redhat.com> - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |