lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Sep]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: iso9660 vs udf
On Sat, Sep 15, 2007 at 11:49:31PM +0200, Andries E. Brouwer wrote:
> What goes wrong on the mount side is that when it hesitates between
> iso9660 and udf it decides for udf when seeing "NSR02".
> Maybe the heuristics in mount should be tuned.

I'd like to see the CD image (or at least first 2Mb). Also try:

# blkid -c /dev/null /dev/cdrom
# /lib/udev/vol_id /dev/cdrom

Maybe vol_id provides better information -- the udf/iso code in
libblkid seems poorer that in libvolume_id.

> If anybody feels responsible for mount and/or this kernel area
> we might discuss.

mount(8) --> util-linux-ng@vger.kernel.org


Karel

--
Karel Zak <kzak@redhat.com>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-09-19 15:27    [W:0.236 / U:0.304 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site