Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 18 Sep 2007 13:11:10 +0400 | From | Sergey Tikhonov <> | Subject | Re: 2.6.23 alpha unistd.h changes |
| |
Oliver Falk wrote: > On 09/17/2007 11:22 PM, Adrian Bunk wrote: > >> On Mon, Sep 17, 2007 at 10:33:07PM +0200, Oliver Falk wrote: >> >>> At Alphacore we used to patch the kernel headers for a while now; We >>> added syscalls __NR_openat (447) until __NR_tee (466). >>> >> Why did your numbers differ from the numbers that were used in the >> upstream kernel? >> > > Afaik, our patch was done a while ago and nobody every submitted it > upstream - don't know why... > Yes, it was done by me and I had no info how to push the updates to upstream, sorry. (by that time, there were no latest "distribution" available with those changes). > At AC, we follow RH/Fedora packages and there we had glibc-kernheaders - > where our patch originates. When the glibc/kernel packages changed and > glibc-kernheaders died, I patched the syscalls into kernel headers; Not > thinking that I better submit it upstream. :-( > Yea, now there is more interest and it is better to do it right. :)
Regards,
-- Sergey Tikhonov
Head, R&D department Solvo Ltd. Saint-Petersburg, Russia http://www.solvo.ru tsv@solvo.ru
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |