Messages in this thread | | | From | David Howells <> | Subject | Re: Credentials test patch | Date | Tue, 18 Sep 2007 18:25:41 +0100 |
| |
Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no> wrote:
> What about the process' capabilities? Shouldn't they also be part of a > credential?
Quite probably. The cred struct is not closed at this point. I certainly would like to move some of the stuff hidden behind the security pointer in the task struct, at least for the purpose of acting on things. For things that act on the task, the task struct needs a resident label that controls that.
David - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |