Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH 5/5][NFS] Cleanup explicit check for mandatory locks | From | Trond Myklebust <> | Date | Tue, 18 Sep 2007 09:27:15 -0400 |
| |
On Tue, 2007-09-18 at 10:20 +0400, Pavel Emelyanov wrote: > Trond Myklebust wrote: > > On Mon, 2007-09-17 at 11:57 +0400, Pavel Emelyanov wrote: > >> The __mandatory_lock(inode) macro makes the same check, but > >> makes the code more readable. > > > > Could we please avoid using underscores in macros. Also, why are we > > breaking the usual convention of capitalising macro names? > > Sorry, I've forgot to change all the log - this is not a macro, > but a static inline function. The underscores are here, because > the mandatory_lock() one already exists and additionally checks > for "if (IS_MANDLOCK(inode))"
OK. I withdraw my objection then.
Cheers Trond
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |