Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 17 Sep 2007 07:35:04 -0700 | From | "Ulrich Drepper" <> | Subject | Re: x86_64: vsyscall vs vdso |
| |
On 9/17/07, Francis Moreau <francis.moro@gmail.com> wrote: > Does that mean we'll need to keep 3 different implementations of gtod > in the kernel forever ?
That's a question for the kernel maintainers to answer.
> I think signal trampolines will still need them too. So making > vsyscalls configurable doesn't seem to work, does it ?
vsyscalls aren't used for that. We have a restorer in libc and could easily use one in the vdso. That's what is done on x86. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |