lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Sep]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] Fix failure to resume from initrds.
Hi!

> > > Anyway, yes, init is freezable, but should it be?
> > >
> > > I mean, shouldn't we rather add PF_NOFREEZE to kernel_init()?
> >
> > Argh, no. PF_NOFREEZE is inherited by the children.
>
> Umm. All of this is __init code - why is freezability even an issue? We
> shouldn't be suspending at this point anyway afaik..

We want to do resume sometime around here, and resume wants to run
with userspace frozen, as does suspend.
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-09-11 18:29    [W:0.040 / U:0.020 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site