Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 11 Sep 2007 18:27:19 +0200 | From | Pavel Machek <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] Fix failure to resume from initrds. |
| |
Hi!
> > > Anyway, yes, init is freezable, but should it be? > > > > > > I mean, shouldn't we rather add PF_NOFREEZE to kernel_init()? > > > > Argh, no. PF_NOFREEZE is inherited by the children. > > Umm. All of this is __init code - why is freezability even an issue? We > shouldn't be suspending at this point anyway afaik..
We want to do resume sometime around here, and resume wants to run with userspace frozen, as does suspend. Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |