Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 10 Sep 2007 15:12:22 -0400 | From | Chuck Ebbert <> | Subject | Re: Why do so many machines need "noapic"? |
| |
On 09/08/2007 01:17 AM, Prakash Punnoor wrote: > On the day of Friday 07 September 2007 Chuck Ebbert hast written: >> On 09/06/2007 07:31 AM, Andi Kleen wrote: >>> Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@redhat.com> writes: >>>> Some systems lock up without the noapic option. >>> Please find patterns: cpu type, chipsets, mainboard vendors etc. >> This is the first one I've actually had in front of me: >> >> HP TX1000 notebook >> Nvidia C51/MCP51 mobile chipset > > Do you have a hpet? If not, have you tried using acpi_use_timer_override with > apic?
Yes, it has an hpet. And I tried every combination of options I could think of.
But, even stranger, x86_64 works (only i386 fails.) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |