Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 8 Aug 2007 22:39:24 +0200 (CEST) | From | Jan Engelhardt <> | Subject | Re: + remove-current-defines-and-uses-of-pr_err-add-pr_emerg.patch added to -mm tree |
| |
On Aug 8 2007 13:31, Joe Perches wrote: >Goals in desired implementation sequence: > >1 Standardization of pr_<level> >2 Correctness of single line uses of pr_<level> >3 Correctness of multiple line uses of printk(<level>) >4 Removal of local near equivalents of pr_<level> >5 Standardization of pr_<level> as single line only >6 Conversion of single line printk(KERN_<level> to pr_level >7 Standardize local #defines to enable/print pr_<level> > __file__/__func__/__line__
I fail to see what problem these are trying to fix. Please post some broken code that would 'benefit' from pr_halleluja, and why printk(level ) could not do the same.
>8 Minimization/elimination of interleaved log messages
This is a separate, and worthwhile, thing to do, yes. And it can be done without deviating from the regular printk().
Jan -- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |