lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Aug]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 00/23] per device dirty throttling -v8
On Sat, 4 Aug 2007 18:37:33 +0200 Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote:

>
> * Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
> > > hm, it turns out that it's due to vim doing an occasional fsync not
> > > only on writeout, but during normal use too. "set nofsync" in the
> > > .vimrc solves this problem.
> >
> > Yes, that's independent. The fact is, ext3 *sucks* at fsync. I hate
> > hate hate it. It's totally unusable, imnsho.
>
> yeah, it's really ugly. But otherwise i've got no real complaint about
> ext3 - with the obligatory qualification that "noatime,nodiratime" in
> /etc/fstab is a must. This speeds up things very visibly - especially
> when lots of files are accessed. It's kind of weird that every Linux
> desktop and server is hurt by a noticeable IO performance slowdown due
> to the constant atime updates,

Not just more IO: it will cause great gobs of blockdev pagecache to remain
in memory, too.


> while there's just two real users of it:
> tmpwatch [which can be configured to use ctime so it's not a big issue]
> and some backup tools. (Ok, and mail-notify too i guess.) Out of tens of
> thousands of applications. So for most file workloads we give Windows a
> 20%-30% performance edge, for almost nothing. (for RAM-starved kernel
> builds the performance difference between atime and noatime+nodiratime
> setups is more on the order of 40%)
>
> Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-08-04 18:55    [W:0.240 / U:1.432 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site