Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 4 Aug 2007 21:21:30 +0200 | From | Ingo Molnar <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 00/23] per device dirty throttling -v8 |
| |
* Jörn Engel <joern@logfs.org> wrote:
> > I actually vote for that. IMO, distros should turn -on- atime > > updates when they know its needed. > > If you mean "relatime" I concur. "noatime" hurts mutt and others > while "relatime" has no known problems, afaics.
so ... one app can keep 30,000+ apps hostage?
i use Mutt myself, on such a filesystem:
/dev/md0 on / type ext3 (rw,noatime,nodiratime,user_xattr)
and i can see no problems, it notices new mails just fine.
Ingo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |