Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 4 Aug 2007 21:00:08 +0200 | From | "Jesper Juhl" <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH][RESEND] Clarify the GPL version of contributions by Jesper Juhl in CREDITS |
| |
On 04/08/07, Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> wrote: > On Sat, Aug 04, 2007 at 08:31:32PM +0200, Jesper Juhl wrote: > > (resending trivial patch, originally from 18/6-2007 02:33) > > > > > > Just to make things clear in the light of recent discussions about > > licensing. > > Stuff I contribute to the Linux kernel are licensed under the terms of the > > GPL version 2. > > This really doesn't elong into CREDITS. If you're not good enough with > the general GPLv2 stance add additional diclaimers to the files you've > made changes to (in an extent that is copyrightable) >
Ok, I can live with that. I just got paranoid after all the recent GVLv2 vs GPLv3 flamewars and though it would be best to just add some explicit note somewhere and couldn't find a more appropriate place than CREDITS to do so.
Feel free to drop this patch...
-- Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@gmail.com> Don't top-post http://www.catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/T/top-post.html Plain text mails only, please http://www.expita.com/nomime.html - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |