Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 22 Aug 2007 07:08:16 -0700 (PDT) | From | James Morris <> | Subject | Re: [2.6.20.17 review 00/58] 2.6.20.17 -stable review |
| |
On Wed, 22 Aug 2007, Stephen Smalley wrote:
> Oops, never mind - tail still follows secmark, so that shouldn't matter. > So I'm not sure why we are getting a bad value for secmark here - should > be initialized to zero and never modified unless there is an iptables > secmark rule.
Michal, do you see this in current git?
-- James Morris <jmorris@namei.org> - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |