lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Aug]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [accounting regression since rc1] scheduler updates
Date
Am Montag, 20. August 2007 schrieb Ingo Molnar:
> could you send that precise sched_clock() patch? It should be an order
> of magnitude simpler than the high-precision stime/utime tracking you
> already do, and it's needed for quality scheduling anyway.

I have a question about that. I just played with sched_clock, and even when I
intentionally slow down sched_clock by a factor of 2, my cpu bound process
gets 100 % in top. If this is intentional, I dont understand how a
virtualized sched_clock would fix the accounting change?

Thanks

Christian
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-08-21 10:19    [W:0.293 / U:0.188 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site