lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Aug]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [rfc] balance-on-fork NUMA placement
On Fri, 3 Aug 2007, Nick Piggin wrote:

> > Ok. So MPOL_BIND on a single node. We would have to save the current
> > memory policy on the stack and then restore it later. Then you would need
> > a special call anyways.
>
> Well the memory policy will already be set to MPOL_BIND at this point.
> The slab allocator I think would just have to honour the node at the
> object level.

Who set the policy? The parent process may have its own memory policy. If
you set that then the earlier policy is lost.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-08-03 03:05    [W:0.039 / U:0.288 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site