Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 16 Aug 2007 12:26:35 +0200 | From | Pavel Machek <> | Subject | Re: [linux-pm] Re: [PATH 1/1] Kexec jump - v2 - kexec jump |
| |
Hi!
> > > +int kexec_flags; > > > + > > > +static unsigned long kexec_jump_buf_pfn; > > > + > > > +static int __init parse_kexec_jump_buf_pfn(char *arg) > > > +{ > > > + if (!arg) > > > + return -EINVAL; > > > + > > > + kexec_jump_buf_pfn = memparse(arg, &arg); > > > + kexec_flags |= KEXEC_FLAGS_IS_KEXECED_KERNEL; > > > + return 0; > > > +} > > > +early_param("kexec_jump_buf_pfn", parse_kexec_jump_buf_pfn); > > > > This one should be documented, too, I'd guess. (Is that internal, > > kernel-to-kernel communication?) > > Document will be added in next version too.
Ping... is there some next version?
I'm stuck at the tools side currently. kexec-1.101 just won't load the kernel properly, and kexec-testing from git does not know -j option. I tried hand-patching it, but got lots of scary rejects.
Is there chance for a patch against kexec-testing? Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |