lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Aug]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] make atomic_t volatile on all architectures


On Sun, 12 Aug 2007, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
>
> It works _most of the time_.

It used to have problems. Gcc has had problems in various areas.

> Ask Martin. Oh you don't even have to,
> he told you two mails ago. My last mail simply pointed out that this
> isn't a GCC bug, but merely documented behaviour.

It was *not* documented behaviour, and there were gcc people who actively
*encouraged* use of "+m", and actually fixed gcc.

The documentation is buggy.

Live with it.

Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-08-12 20:03    [W:0.061 / U:0.040 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site