lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Jul]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: A simpler variant on sys_indirect?
Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> The batching has serious problems, not the least of which is that it's a
> fundamentally more complex interface, and introduces issues like "how do
> we pass values from one system call to the next".
>

Why, we obviously need a Turing-complete language running in kernel
space (interpreted, of course, to keep it secure.) Pretty soon we can
run the whole app in it, and we'll have to have a JIT to make it suck on
less. Since it's going to need caffeine, we can call it "Java."

-hpa

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-07-07 06:13    [W:0.072 / U:0.060 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site