Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 06 Jul 2007 21:09:34 -0700 | From | "H. Peter Anvin" <> | Subject | Re: A simpler variant on sys_indirect? |
| |
Linus Torvalds wrote: > > The batching has serious problems, not the least of which is that it's a > fundamentally more complex interface, and introduces issues like "how do > we pass values from one system call to the next". >
Why, we obviously need a Turing-complete language running in kernel space (interpreted, of course, to keep it secure.) Pretty soon we can run the whole app in it, and we'll have to have a JIT to make it suck on less. Since it's going to need caffeine, we can call it "Java."
-hpa
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |