Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 7 Jul 2007 16:07:15 -0700 (PDT) | From | Christoph Lameter <> | Subject | Re: 2.6.22-rc7: known regressions with patches v2 |
| |
On Sat, 7 Jul 2007, Michal Piotrowski wrote:
> > If you're looking for someone to blame, consider the fact that this has > > gone away now I've switched back to slab. :) > Yup, I forgot to add Christoph to CC :)
Hmmmm.. Cannot see the corruption in the dump since it only includes 128 bytes and it seems to have occurred way into the object. If you want to dump 32k to your syslog to see the corruption then look at the print_trailer() function and change the parameter of the call to print_section
print_section("Object", p, min(s->objsize, 128));
This is a 32k sized slab and SLAB does not allow debugging on power of two slabs > pagesize.... No surprise that SLAB does not complain.
What are these functions "malloc" and "free"? Would be good if those would be using kmalloc_track_caller() so that we can figure out who called them.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |