Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 6 Jul 2007 23:54:53 +0200 (CEST) | From | Jan Engelhardt <> | Subject | Re: Question about cpufreq governors |
| |
On Jul 6 2007 22:50, DervishD wrote: > > What I want to know is if I can choose "ondemand" governor instead >of the recommended for AMD64, namely the "conservative" governor, since >I will be switching between those two frequencies. I haven't found any >information about my CPU regarding latency when switching between >frequencies, so I don't know if I will be gaining anything using the >"conservative" governor. > > Which governor is better suited for a CPU with only two fid's, >"ondemand" or "conservative"?
Depends on what you want. ondemand instantly switches when there is something/nothing to do, while conservative uses a threshold (modeled upon latency).
Jan -- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |